________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Boy in the Picture: A Remembrance


sumiteru taniguchi at un
Atomic bomb survivor Sumiteru Taniguchi, giving a speech at the United Nations
in New York in 2010 against the existence of nuclear weapons while holding up
a photo of himself from 1946 in Nagasaki.

A 16-year-old Japanese boy lies face down on a hospital bed, his eyes closed and face partially obscured from view. His back and arms, oozing blood and pus, show the severe radiation burns he suffered during the atomic bombing of his city, Nagasaki, just five months before by the United States. He is still clinging to life and the Japanese doctors keeping him in a bath of penicillin to fight off infection seem amazed that the boy is still alive.

“I shuddered when the lights were turned on to film him,”
recalled Herbert Sussan, a U.S. military video specialist assigned to film Japanese survivors of the two atomic-bombed cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in January 1946. The youth with the severely burned back was the worst of the cases his U.S. filming team had come across. “None of us expected him to live,” Sussan said, “but the doctors persisted.”

It was that persistence alone by doctors in Nagasaki that saved the life of the youth, and for decades afterward, Sumiteru Taniguchi would go on to publicly display to the world that video image of himself as the boy with the bleeding back, in an appeal for the permanent banning of nuclear weapons.

A
New York Times obituary on Taniguchi, who died of cancer in Nagasaki on 30 August at age 88, is indicative of the high status Taniguchi held as one of the more well-known, publicly identifiable of the hibakusha atomic bomb survivors in Japan. News outlets around the world have reported on his passing, and told and retold his story.

Taniguchi was a teenage postal carrier delivering the mail on his bicycle around 11 a.m. that morning of 9 August 1945, and was 1.8 kilometers (about one mile) from the hypocenter when the “Fat Man” plutonium bomb — as it was nicknamed by the U.S. military — was dropped over the city, killing at least 40,000 people instantly, most of whom were civilians. Like many victims of the bomb that day, Taniguchi was subjected to a wall of heat measuring an estimated 4,000 degrees Celsius (more than 7,000 degrees Fahrenheit), hot enough to melt steel.

Those who died instantly in the blast or were simply vaporized into ashes may have been the lucky ones; those who survived faced a hellish reality of death and destruction all around them. Many, like Taniguchi, had their clothing grafted onto their skin by the bomb blast and could not keep their skin from sliding off their bodies. And like many, Taniguchi lived on the border of life and death in the immediate years of medical treatment that ensued.

Taniguchi would go on to say that in surviving the atomic bombing, he grew up with an intense hate for the world of adults that would do such a thing to him as a child. It was perhaps not surprising, then, that Taniguchi would later join, and then lead as chairperson,
Nihon Hidankyo, an organization formed by atomic bomb sufferers in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1956 to pressure the Japanese government to improve support for the victims and to lobby governments of the world to abolish nuclear weapons forever.

In interviews and speeches in Japan and overseas over the years, Taniguchi would often hold up that famous film image of himself as the youth with the bleeding back for others to see. He did it less for pity or to accuse than as a stark reminder of what nuclear bombs can do to human beings and as a warning to never let such a horror be repeated. In the 2007 documentary film
White Light/Black Rain: The Destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by Japanese-American filmmaker Steven Okazaki (which I encourage you to watch here in its entirety), Taniguchi removes his shirt for the camera and reveals his once-bleeding back as it now looked decades later: still heavily scarred and still prone to infection. Like other survivors of the two atomic bombings, he was constantly plagued by radiation-induced illnesses and ailments through the rest of his life.

In 2010, Taniguchi, representing Japan’s atomic bomb survivors, reiterated his appeal for the banning of nuclear weapons during a review conference for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty at the United Nations in New York City. “I am not a guinea pig, nor am I an exhibit,”
he told the audience, once again showing the well-known photo of him as an ailing 16-year-old. “But you who are here today, please don’t turn your eyes away from me. Please look at me again.”

The
hibakusha of Japan, over these past seven decades, have had to make sure two governments in particular get that message loud and clear: the United States, as the foremost nuclear power in the world, and Japan, with its increasing moves toward remilitarization as a staunch U.S. ally protected under the American nuclear umbrella.

Have these two governments gotten that message? Apparently not. In July 2017, just a month before Taniguchi died, 122 countries of the world voted to pass the
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons at the United Nations in New York. This is the first legally binding international agreement ever to comprehensively prohibit nuclear weapons; the goal is total elimination of all nuclear weapons on the planet. But the governments of the United States and Japan, among a few others, have essentially boycotted the treaty negotiations from the start for political reasons and will not support its passage.

How supremely ironic it is that today the government of Japan, the only country ever to have been the victim of a nuclear bomb attack during war, will stand on the side of the USA, which dropped those bombs on Japan back in 1945, in opposing a treaty that could very well save us all from nuclear annihilation someday. In any case, with or without American and Japanese government support, the formal signing and enactment of this important treaty will go on as scheduled and take place later this month in New York on 20 September.

Sumiteru Taniguchi, at 88 years of age, did not live long enough to see this long-awaited day come, but his soul can rest peacefully knowing that he did as much as any one person could have done to help bring it about. From that hospital bed in Nagasaki in 1946 as a severely injured boy lingering near death, to his last public anti-nuclear appeal in Malaysia in 2016 as an ailing elder, he kept the hope for a truly peaceful world alive and in front of us, never allowing us to look away or to forget the past.

May we all find it within ourselves to help carry on his final wish from here and see that it becomes a permanent reality for our world, epitomized in the two simple words: “Never again”.

POTUS Comes to Hiroshima


abe-obama at hiroshima


History was made one month ago when POTUS (President of the United States)
Barack Obama landed in the city of Hiroshima, Japan — the first sitting American president to ever visit the site since it was destroyed by a single atomic bomb on August 6, 1945.

Depending on who you are and what your political views may be, the visit to Hiroshima by Obama was: (1) flawless, with one of the greatest speeches of all time (2) a good photo opportunity and little else (3) a great disappointment, since he didn’t apologize to the Japanese for anything (4) an insult to American war veterans for daring to go there in the first place (5) an obvious slight to the Japanese atomic survivors, since he didn’t listen to any of their stories of suffering (6) a missed chance at making a major anti-nuclear policy speech (7) or anything else you can think of.

Such is the sensitive and emotional nature of the issue of the U.S. atomic bombing of Hiroshima, and the city of Nagasaki three days later on August 9, 1945, that POTUS Obama was stepping into a historical minefield before he even landed in Japan. But that is perhaps as it should be. Hiroshima has gone down in the history books as one of the most heinous acts of genocide on a mostly civilian population, with an estimated 150,000 people killed in Hiroshima and another 70,000 people killed in Nagasaki a few days later. Nothing any U.S. leader says or does will ever change those facts.

But that said, it was good that POTUS came to Hiroshima. He came, he laid flowers at the memorial located in the Hiroshima Peace Park, he spoke, he shook a few hands. It was all well planned and perfectly choreographed. But then, in a moment of spontaneity, POTUS embraced an elderly Japanese
hibakusha atomic bomb survivor, with the survivor weeping in Obama’s arms. That will be the iconic image of the POTUS visit to Hiroshima for many years to come.

Be honest: It made your eyes fill with tears, didn’t it? Well, it did mine. I thought of all the suffering that the Japanese atomic bomb survivors had gone through over the years, and I know there were surely a lot of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors crying as they watched that emotional embrace on television on that day last month. Their pain and suffering were at least being acknowledged by the leader of the Free World.

And yet, I had some problems with the celebrated POTUS swing through Hiroshima.

“Seventy-one years ago, on a bright cloudless morning, death fell from the sky and the world was changed,” Obama began his speech at Hiroshima. Motoko Rich, a
New York Times reporter of Japanese-American descent who recently assumed the position of Tokyo bureau chief for the newspaper, had a similar take on her Facebook page: “Seventy-one years ago, two bombs fell on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”

Fell? Obama’s “Death fell from the sky” sounds so much more passive and neutral than: “Death was transported thousands of miles from the U.S. mainland and dropped from the sky over Hiroshima from a U.S. warplane by U.S. military personnel onto an unknowing Japanese civilian population.” Bombs don’t just “fall” from the sky — they are intentionally dropped by one side fighting another, with little regard for the victims below. That is the nature of bombs used in war, and certainly so when it came to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Then there was the image of a supposedly liberal U.S. president, Barack Obama, standing side by side with Shinzo Abe, the prime minister of Japan, that day in Hiroshima. Abe interrupted his ongoing campaign of trying to gut Japan’s postwar pacifist constitution long enough to get his picture taken alongside Obama. The ironies abounded: Here was the neo-fascist prime minister of Japan, who has made gutting Japan’s constitution the top goal of his administration, standing next to a liberal U.S. president literally on the ashes of the dead who covered the ground of Hiroshima in 1945, with both leaders talking about the need for peace in the world.

And that liberal president, Obama, is the first U.S. president in history to enter and leave office with his nation at war — the
first true “war president” in U.S. history. This, despite that fact that he has received the Nobel Peace Prize while doing little actual work for peace in the world.

Obama, a constitutional law scholar, by all rights should have been scolding Abe for his ongoing actions to gut the no-war clause, Article 9, from Japan’s constitution. But Obama and his administration have been doing just the opposite in recent years: encouraging prime minister Abe in his plans to curtail civil rights in the name of strengthening the U.S.-Japan national security relationship. And of course, Obama himself has done quite a bit of damage on his own to citizens’ rights in the USA in the “war on terror” that he has dramatically expanded since he took office.

And then, there is the supreme irony of POTUS coming to Hiroshima at a time when the U.S. is embarking on a massive upgrade of its aging nuclear weapons arsenal, which in effect means that nuclear bombs will be smaller, faster and more capable of inflicting much greater damage than they did 71 years ago in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Yes, it was good that POTUS came to Hiroshima — someone had to do it sooner or later, and I suppose Obama would be the best choice for a first American president to set foot in the city. Obama spent less than two hours in Hiroshima that day, but he made history. He didn’t apologize for anything, nor was he expected to by the Japanese government. It was a symbolic visit more than anything else, and sometimes symbolic gestures are very important when it comes to healing the deep scars of past wars. But the POTUS stopover in Hiroshima could have been so much more meaningful and substantial with just a bit more foresight and planning on the part of the Obama administration.

Now that POTUS has been to Hiroshima and experienced the legacy of what U.S. bombs can do to the cities of its foreign enemies, let us hope that the next time Obama decides to approve a deadly drone strike against some perceived enemy in the Middle East or elsewhere, he stops and thinks twice: once for Hiroshima and once for Nagasaki. If a hesitation to launch military attacks in which innocent civilians may be killed is all that was achieved by Obama in his unprecedented visit to the atomic-bombed city in Japan last month, then maybe, just maybe, his visit to Hiroshima was worth it.

See Older Posts...